NEWARK LADDER & BRACKET COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MONTAGUE EADIE, PAUL DIGIROLAMO, AND AMERICAN LADDER & SCAFFOLD COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that merely shipping goods into Florida from out-of-state, without more, does not constitute 'carrying on a business or business venture' for the purpose of establishing jurisdiction under the long-arm statute.
A Florida corporation ordered goods from a New Jersey corporation, which shipped them into Florida on open account. The Florida corporation sought to …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdiction Over The Person cases and more on FLexlaw
The issue upon this interlocutory appeal1 is whether the Newark Ladder & Bracket Company, a New Jersey corporation, was shown to be “carrying on a business or business venture” in the State of Florida so that service of process under the provision of Section 47.16(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. was lawfully accomplished. The issue was properly raised by the New Jersey corporation upon motion to quash service of process, and from an adverse ruling this appeal was perfected.
The trial judge had before him two affidavits, one filed by the New Jersey corporation in support of its motion and one filed by the cross-plaintiff, an appellee herein, in support of the service. No other evidence was offered or considered. A careful examination of the affidavits, in the light most favorable to the conclusion reached by the trial judge, reveals only that the New Jersey corporation shipped goods in interstate commerce from New Jersey to Florida when ordered by the American Ladder & Scaffold Company, Inc., a Florida corporation. The affidavits further establish that the goods were shipped upon open account.
The mere act of shipping goods to a single customer, who is not a broker, jobber, wholesaler or distributor,2 from a *916point outside the state does not subject one to the jurisdiction of the courts of the state.3
Reversed.
HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.