JAMES D. GISONDI
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., SUCCESSOR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of the Bank of America successor was proper and is affirmed.
This case involves a mortgage foreclosure action. James D. Gisondi appealed a judgment entered by the trial court against him in favor of Federal Nati…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
JAMES D. GISONDI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3960 ) FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed February 2, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Marion L. Fleming, Senior Judge.
Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellant.
Daniel S. Stein and Mary Pascal Stella of Popkin & Rosaler, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.