ESPOSITA
v.
SUNTRUST BANK

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-01-29
No. 5D17-3552
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court lacks jurisdiction to enter a summary final judgment in foreclosure when the case has been removed to federal court.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court is divested of jurisdiction once a civil action is removed to federal court and cannot enter judgments in the action.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Deano S. Esposita appealed a summary final judgment of foreclosure issued by the trial court in Seminole County. SunTrust Bank filed a confession of e…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DEANO S. ESPOSITA,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-3552 SUNTRUST BANK, AMY C. ESPOSITA, REGIONS BANK D/B/A AMSOUTH BANK AND MAGNOLIA PLANTATION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellees. /

Opinion filed February 2, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Susan Stacy, Judge. Deano S. Esposita, Lake Mary, pro se. Charles P. Gufford, of McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee, SunTrust Bank. No appearance for other Appellees.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to SunTrust Bank’s Confession of Error, we reverse the Summary Final Judgment of Foreclosure, as the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment because the case had been removed to federal court. We remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED. SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw