N.M., THE FATHER
v.
DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

Fla. 4th DCA | 2018-01-11
No. 17-3135
Blume, Kimball, Rineb
237 So. 3d 1009 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's order regarding the Department of Children and Families' action was properly decided and affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

A father appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County involving a dependency case with the Depart…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

N.M., the Father,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3135

[January 11, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Stacey Shulman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2015 3502 DP.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, Assistant Attorney General, Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. TAYLOR, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw