PETER STANWAY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.
Peter Stanway filed a Rule 3.850 motion in a criminal case from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County. The trial cou…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
PETER STANWAY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D16-1725
[January 4, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2006CF005962A.
Peter Stanway, Malone, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.