ESTON EDDIE DINKINS

v.

COCHRAN

Citator

Cited By

• Carter v. State, 199 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
  …edge by the searching officer by comparison to what a reasonable man, knowing all the facts which the searching officer knew, would have believed under all of the circumstances. Gispert v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 596, cert. denied, Fla.1960, 122 So. 2d 782.’ ” In Casso v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 252, this Court upheld legality of an arrest without a warrant under the facts [*329] therein found to exist, and we laid down the rule as follows (text 182 So. 2d 257): “ * * * [t]he arrest, with it…
• Paula v. State, 188 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …edge by the searching officer by comparison to what a reasonable man, knowing all the facts which the searching officer knew, would have believed under all of the circumstances. Gispert v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 596, cert. denied, Fla.1960, 122 So. 2d 782.” Measured by the above yardstick, the affidavit for the search warrant involved in the instant case falls well within the orbit described. Such being the only point raised on this appeal, it follows that the judgment and sentence appealed from is—…
• McCAIN v. State, 151 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
  …the searching officer by comparison to what a reasonable man, knowing all the facts which the searching officer [*845] knew, would have believed under all of the circumstances. Gispert v. State, Fla.App. 1960, 118 So. 2d 596, cert. denied, Fla.1960, 122 So. 2d 782. The . facts here adequately meet the test required for probable cause to search and seize contraband without a warrant. The question of illegal search and seizure concerns only the particular Chevrolet automobile. The facts indicate knowledge of ap…