STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1960-04-20
THOMAS, C. J., ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and WHITE, Circuit Judge, concur.
119 So. 2d 785 Florida Supreme Court (1960)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the City of Miami has the authority to issue bonds for parking facilities and that the enabling ordinance is valid.


Facts & Procedural History

The City of Miami proposed to issue $3,000,000 in Parking Facilities Revenue Bonds to acquire property, construct parking garages, and pay for parking…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree of the lower court validating $3,000,000 of Parking Facilities Revenue Bonds proposed to be issued by the City of Miami to acquire property and construct thereon two parking garages and to pay for additional parking sites and on-street 'parking meters. We find no error in the decree of validation.

The appellant’s contentions respecting the invalidity of certain provisions of the enabling ordinance under § 6 of Article IX of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. are disposed of adversely to its contention by the decisions of this court in Welker v. State, Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 591, and State v. City of Coral Gables, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 48.

The attack made on the ordinance as an unlawful delegation of power to the parking consultants must be held to be without merit under the authority of State v. Inter-American Center Authority, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 9.

The question posed by the appellants as to the authority of the City to regulate parking in view of the provisions of the Home Rule Charter of Dade County, is also without merit. See State v. City of North Miami Beach, Fla.1959, 108 So.2d 764.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, C. J., ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and WHITE, Circuit Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw