PRESSLEY BERNARD ALSTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. PRESSLEY BERNARD ALSTON, PETITIONER, V. JULIE L. JONES, ETC., RESPONDENT.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Pressley Bernard Alston sought postconviction relief under Hurst v. Florida, which established that jury findings are required for capital sentencing. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the denial of relief, finding that Alston's 2003 waiver of postconviction proceedings and counsel precluded him from raising a Hurst claim, and that Hurst would not apply retroactively to his 1999 death sentence.
Alston's valid 2003 waiver of postconviction proceedings and counsel precludes him from claiming a right to relief under Hurst. Additionally, even if the waiver did not preclude the claim, Hurst would not apply retroactively to Alston's 1999 death sentence because retroactive application of new constitutional rules to final sentences is not permitted.
[1] A defendant's valid waiver of postconviction proceedings and counsel precludes the defendant from claiming relief under Hurst v. …
[2] Hurst v. …
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Alston's valid waiver of postconviction proceedings and counsel in 2003 precludes him from claiming a right to relief under Hurst.”
Establishes the primary basis for denying relief—that a valid waiver bars postconviction Hurst claims.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAlston was sentenced to death, and his sentence became final in 1999. In 2003, Alston executed a valid waiver of postconviction proceedings and counse…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Retroactive Application Of Statutes cases and more on FLexlaw
We have for review Pressley Bernard Alston's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Alston's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and Alston's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9) Fla. Const. We withdraw the opinion issued on January 22, 2018, and substitute this opinion in its place.
Alston seeks relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in Hurst v. State , 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Alston's appeal and consideration of his habeas petition pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied , *886--- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock , Alston responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in both cases. Then, after this Court decided State v. Silvia , 235 So.3d 349 (Fla. 2018), Alston responded to this Court's order to show cause why Silvia should not be dispositive in both cases.
After reviewing Alston's responses to the orders to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Alston's valid waiver of postconviction proceedings and counsel in 2003 precludes him from claiming a right to relief under Hurst . See Silvia , 235 So.3d 349 ; Alston v. State , 894 So.2d 46 (Fla. 2004). Moreover, Alston's sentence of death became final in 1999. Alston v. State , 723 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1998). Thus, even if Alston's postconviction waiver did not preclude him from raising a Hurst claim, Hurst would not apply retroactively to Alston's sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court's denial of relief and deny Alston's habeas petition.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
CANADY, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
LEWIS, J., dissents.
CANADY, J., concurring in result.
I would base the denial of relief to Alston on my view that Hurst should not be given retroactive application. See Mosley v. State , 209 So.3d 1248, 1285-91 (Fla. 2016) (Canady, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited (13 total)
- Hurst v. Florida., 136 S. Ct. 616 (U.S. 2016)
- Hurst v. State, 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016)
- Florida v. Hurst., 137 S. Ct. 2161 (U.S. 2017)
- Hitchcock v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017)
- Rainey v. Dist. Attorney Off. of Philadelphia., 138 S. Ct. 513 (U.S. 2017)
- Ward v. Neal, 137 S. Ct. 2161 (U.S. 2017)
- Boone v. Lorie Davis, 137 S. Ct. 2163 (U.S. 2017)
- Mosley v. State, 209 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. 2016)
- Pressley Alston v. State, 723 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1998)
- Loud v. Lorie Davis, 138 S. Ct. 513 (U.S. 2017)