JOHN M. ACKERMAN AND MILDRED ACKERMAN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. | 1959-10-02
115 So. 2d 414 Florida Supreme Court (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Anne E. Nance v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 436 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
    …71 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Marlowe v. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc., 284 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 291 So. 2d 205 (Fla.1974); Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Moroni, 113 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958), cert. denied, 115 So. 2d 414 (Fla.1959). It is equally well settled that a plaintiff may use evidence of the occurrence or non-occurrence of prior or subsequent accidents to prove constructive notice of the dangerous character of a condition. Perret v. Seaboard Coast Line Rai…
  • …Man proviso should be strictly construed and limited to its narrowest application. By applying this rule we reduce to a minimum the restrictions on the broader remedial statute. Day v. Stickle, Fla.App., 113 So. 2d 559, 80 A.L.R.2d 1291, cert. den. 115 So. 2d 414; Harper v. Johnson, Tex. 1961, 345 S.W. 2d 277; Jones on Evidence (5th Ed.) Vol. 3, Section 774, page 1440; Wigmore on Evidence (3rd Ed. 1940), Section 578. With a view to the rules of statutory construction and the historical background [*369] of…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw