ROMEO WARD, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2017-10-11
No. CASE NO. 1D17-1526
ROBERTS, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
227 So. 3d 761 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2017) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hines v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
    …PER CURIAM. Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See Ward v. State, 227 So. 3d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below). Petitioner’s request for payment pursuant to section 79.05, Florida Statutes, is denied. ROWE, MAKAR, and OSTERH…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw