JONATHAN SAMUDIO-FACYSON, APPELLANT,

v.

CHRISTINE FACYSON, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• G.M.R. v. Dept. of Children and Families, 262 So. 3d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
  …ated dependent, but it does not demonstrate that K.M. was also adjudicated dependent. Thus, the trial court erred in basing the termination of G.M.R.’s parental rights on section 39.806(1)(e)(1). See T.H. v. State, Dep’t of Children & Families, 226 So. 3d 915, 918 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (reversing portion of trial court’s final judgment terminating parental rights under section 39.806(1)(e)(1) because “there was no adjudication of dependency and no case plan had been filed with the court.”). There is,…
• P.R. v. Dep't of Child. & Families (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)
  …hospitalized, and he will soon be able to provide a home for her. “[A] manifest best interests decision is not made to protect the legal rights of the parents; it is made to ensure the best interests of each child.” T.H. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 226 So. 3d 915, 919– 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (quoting K.D. v. Dep’t of Child. & Family Servs., 132 So. 3d 877, 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)). To evaluate whether termination of parental rights is in the manifest best interests of the child, a trial court must consider al…
• M.M.W. v. J.W. (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)