244 NORTH BAY SHORE DRIVE, INC.

v.

USSERY

Citator

Cited By

• Alan Stoler, D.D.S. v. Martin Levinson, P.A., 394 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …ague, we are nonetheless convinced that the other items of damages were sufficiently shown as to attorney fee costs, nominal damages and punitive damages so as to send this case to the jury. Adler v. Segal, 108 So. 2d 773 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 113 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1959); Burchell v. Bechert, 356 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 367 So. 2d 1122 (Fla.1978); compare Fee, Parker & Lloyd, P.A. v. Sullivan, 379 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The trial court, however, was eminently correct in grantin…
• Knight Ridder, Inc. v. Dade Aviation Consultants, 808 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …ose because no “full and complete disclosure” of the operative facts upon which its legal conclusions depended was ever made to counsel. See Glass v. Parrish, 51 So. 2d 717 (Fla.1951); Adler v. Segal, 108 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 113 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1959); Williams v. Confidential Credit Corp., 114 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959); Paulk v. Buczynski, 106 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). Indeed, it misled counsel by withholding, only for example, the actual agreement between the consultants and…
• Sci. Prods. v. Garcia, 442 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …burn v. Davenport, 286 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 295 So. 2d 301 (Fla.1974) (whether plaintiff instituted prosecution upon which action is based is question for the jury); Adler v. Segal, 108 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 113 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1959) (question of whether there had been full and fair disclosure to prosecuting attorney is jury question).…

Authorities Cited

• Mrs. Nicey Ussery v. 244 N. BAY Shore Drive, Inc., 106 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)