DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR FREMONT HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-3, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-3, APPELLANT,
v.
LISA ANN DOWD A/K/A LISA A. DOWD, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Standing To Foreclose cases and more on FLexlaw
On appeal from mortgage foreclosure proceedings, a bank challenges the trial court’s order involuntarily dismissing its case against a borrower based on its determination that the bank failed to prove its standing to foreclose. After reviewing the record, we determine the bank presented competent, substantial evidence that it possessed the blank-endorsed note at the time suit was filed and thereby demonstrated that it had standing to foreclose at the inception of the suit. See Bolous v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass’n, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2448, 210 So.3d 691, 2016 WL 6476320 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 2, 2016); Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Marciano, 190 So.3d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).
We therefore reverse and remand for reinstatement of the final judgment of foreclosure.
Reversed and remanded with instructions;
Ciklin, C.J., Damoorgian and Gerber, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
USAA Gen. Indem. Co. v. William J. Gogan, M.D., 238 So. 3d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Lenworth Bailey v. Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC, 889 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2018)…dically necessary services PIP insurers are required to reimburse." 141 So. 3d at 153 (emphasis added). In addition, at least one appellate court in Florida has endorsed Bailey's position in dicta. See Green v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. , 225 So. 3d 229, 231-32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017) ("[The PIP statute] permits insurers to limit reimbursement to 80% of the maximum charges allowed by the Medicare Part B fee schedules. ... If an insurer elects this method in its policy, the medical provider i…
Authorities Cited
- Meranda W. Bolous v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortg. Sec. Corp., 210 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Ari F. Marciano, 190 So. 3d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)