JESUS MELENDEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY TRANSIT, APPELLEE
JESUS MELENDEZ, APPELLANT,
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY TRANSIT, APPELLEE
217 So. 3d 1138
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Artigas v. Allstate Ins. Co., 541 So.2d 739, 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Miami Transit Co. v. Ford, 159 So.2d 261, 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Peterson v. Cent. Fla. Reg’l Transp., 769 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Silberman v. Miami Dade Transit, 927 F.3d 1123 (11th Cir. 2019)…rdance with the procedures established by the County Manager pursuant to Section 2-148.” Adding to the intrigue, MDT has been a named defendant in two recent state-court decisions, seemingly without incident. See Melendez v. Miami-Dade Cty. Transit, 217 So. 3d 1138 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 2017); McFarlane v. Miami-Dade Transit Auth., 215 So. 3d 658 (Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. App. 2017). Happily, we needn't hazard an Erie guess about whether MDT is sui juris because Silberman doesn't challenge the district court's det…
Authorities Cited
- Miami Transit Co. v. Ford, 159 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Artigas v. Allstate Ins. Co. & Metro. Dade Cnty., 541 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Peterson v. Cent. Fla. Reg'l Transp., 769 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)