FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND ELSEY TERESA FLORES, APPELLANTS,
v.
SERGIO VAN EDWARDS, APPELLEE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND ELSEY TERESA FLORES, APPELLANTS,
SERGIO VAN EDWARDS, APPELLEE
214 So. 3d 800
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
We hold that the Division of Administrative Hearings had subject matter jurisdiction to enter an order of child support. See Dep’t of Revenue v. Graczyk, 206 So.3d 157, 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (“Section 409.2563 confers concurrent jurisdiction on DOR/DOAH to establish child support obligations when there is no court order of support”) (emphasis added). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the Administrative Law Judge to order such child support as is appropriate.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Murillo, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…out of the administrative proceeding, DOAH had concurrent jurisdiction to establish Appellee’s child support obligation and a support order should have been entered. See § 409.2563(2)(a), (c), Fla. Stat. (2016); Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. Van Edwards, 214 So. 3d 800, 2017 WL 1372663 (Fla. 1st DCA Apr. 13, 2017); Dep’t of Revenue v. Graczyk, 206 So. 3d 157, 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings. WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.…
Authorities Cited
- Dep't OF Revenue & Mark Cole Cruickshank v. Graczyk, 206 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)