DERRISE HOWARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2017-03-10
No. CASE NO. 1D17-0089
ROBERTS, C. J., WINOKUR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ„ CONCUR.
212 So. 3d 534 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2017) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order dated January 10, 2017, and having determined the appeal is untimely, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

ROBERTS, C. J., WINOKUR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ„ CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • T.S. v. State, 227 So. 3d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
    …‘one [dispositional] level is better suited to serving both the rehabilitative needs of the juvenile-in the least restrictive setting-and maintaining the ability of the State to protect the public from further acts of delinquency.’ ” M.J. v. State, 212 So. 3d 534, 537-38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (quoting E.A.R., 4 So. 3d at 638). Appellate review under E.A.R. is deemed “rigorous,” making it “a difficult matter” to disregard an agency recommendation such that doing so “is no easy task and will take time and consid…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw