RAY E. GREEN, AS COMPTROLLER, OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. AMERICAN CAN COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, APPELLEE
RAY E. GREEN, AS COMPTROLLER, OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. AMERICAN CAN COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, APPELLEE
112 So. 2d 298
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of the opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in United States Gypsum Company v. Green, 110 So.2d 409.
STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grapes v. Mitchell, 159 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 1963)…ut even had he actually intended to defraud his children of their share of their mother’s estate, equitable relief would obtain as between the immediate parties because of fiduciary violation or fraudulent procurement or concealment. Mills v. Mills, 112 So. 2d 298, Fla.App. (1959). Had the father been remarried at the time of the execution of the waivers or later of the deeds, it is quite likely some written trust agreement would have been demanded or a prompt distribution of the assets of the trust estate w…
-
Willard v. Hallam, 132 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)…as an oral agreement. If defendant had orally promised to hold the properties in trust for her mother at the time she received them, such promise was an attempt to create an oral express trust and was unenforceable. See Mills v. Mills, Fla.App.1959, 112 So. 2d 298; Wodonos v. Wodonos, Fla., 1952, 62 So. 2d 78; Crockett v. Crockett, 1940, 145 Fla. 311, 199 So. 337; and section 689.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The judgment reason would not necessarily mean that Mrs. Hallam wanted to save the properties for hers…
-
MacKnet v. Rogers, 119 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)…n thereof, by his previously testifying concerning the transaction in a broad sense. Appellant cites two recent Florida cases as controlling in the instant case. Rappaport v. Kalstein, 156 Fla. 722, 24 So. 2d 301, and Mills v. Mills, Fla.App. 1959, 112 So. 2d 298; in each a deed of conveyance was signed and delivered to the alleged beneficiary and the grantee was placed in possession (physical possession in one, and at least constructive possession in the other). And in each case it was held that the grantee…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Green, 110 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 1959)