DINA PORUBSKY, APPELLANT,
v.
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE
DINA PORUBSKY, APPELLANT,
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE
208 So. 3d 322
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2017)
Opinion of the Court
Dina Porubsky appeals from a final order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, which affirmed a referee’s decision to disqualify her from receiving unemployment benefits. Having carefully considered Ms. Porubsky’s arguments on appeal and the record before us, we affirm. See, e.g., Parker v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 41 So.3d 1090, 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct ... [and thus], if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal referee’s findings ... this court must affirm.”) (citations omitted).1
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Parker v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 41 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
- Sheridan v. State, 873 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- Soonja Roach v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 873 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)