PAMELA Z. WHITE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIE D. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
GREYMAR ASSOCIATES, LLC, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Bona Fide Purchaser cases and more on FLexlaw
We affirm the trial court’s entry of partial summary judgment, as well as the subsequent final judgment of foreclosure, each entered in favor of appellee, upon its determination that appellee was a bona fide purchaser for value, and because there was no evidence establishing that, at the time appellee acquired its mortgage interest, it had constructive or actual notice of the existence of an unrecorded agreement, upon which appellant relies for the contention that appellant had a previously-acquired and outstanding interest in the property. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); Gabel v. Drewrys Ltd., U.S.A., Inc., 68 So.2d 372 (Fla.1953); Warner v. Watson, 35 Fla. 402, 17 So. 654 (1895). We also find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to stay execution of the final judgment.1
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Warner v. Watson, 35 Fla. 402 (Fla. 1895)
- Gabel v. Drewrys Ltd., 68 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1953)