RICHARD S. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2016-10-14
No. 5D16-269
BERGER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
207 So. 3d 271 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2016)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Richard S. Davis appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm. However, as to Davis’ claim that the written sentence does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, our affirmance is without prejudice to his ability to file an amended motion raising the same claim, while specifying in that claim the date of the sentencing hearing to which he is referring.1

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw