IN THE INTEREST OF D.S. AND G.S., CHILDREN. C.S., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, AND J.S., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed and remanded because the trial court closed a dependency case and terminated jurisdiction without entering a written adjudication order or conducting a required disposition hearing.
A trial court must enter a written order adjudicating children dependent and conduct a disposition hearing under section 39.521, Florida Statutes, before closing a dependency case and terminating jurisdiction.
[1] A trial court must enter a written order adjudicating children dependent and conduct a properly noticed disposition hearing under section 39.521, Florida Statutes, before…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe trial court orally adjudicated two children dependent but failed to enter a written adjudication order and failed to conduct a disposition hearing…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Termination Of Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
C.S., • the natural mother of D.S. and G.S., appeals an order denying her motion to vacate an order closing the case and terminating the court’s jurisdiction over the case. The proceeding that led to the entry of the order closing the ease had been entered on the court’s “own motion” without proper notice to the mother, and the order was entered over objection by the Department of Children and Families and the mother. In light of the Depart*122ment’s concession of error in this case, we decline to discuss all of the proceedings below. We observe only that prior to entering the order closing the case, the trial court had orally adjudicated the children dependent, but it had failed to enter a written order adjudicating the children dependent and it had failed to conduct a disposition hearing. The Department concedes that, under the facts in this case, the trial court was required to conduct a disposition hearing under section 39.521, Florida Statutes (2015), before closing the case and terminating jurisdiction. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court1 to enter a written order adjudicating the children dependent, hold a properly noticed disposition hearing, and enter a disposition order. The children shall remain in their current placement pending the entry of a disposition order.
Reversed and remanded.
NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.