FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
MARICELA CESPEDES, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Peninsula Insurance Company appeals the trial court's refusal to comply with an appellate mandate directing entry of final summary judgment in its favor on the issue of sinkhole coverage exclusion in a homeowner's insurance policy. The court enforces its mandate and requires the trial court to enter final judgment for Florida Peninsula.
When an appellate court issues a mandate, compliance by the lower court is a purely ministerial act. The trial court was required to enter final judgment in favor of Florida Peninsula as directed by the appellate mandate, and the litigation is concluded by such judgment.
[1] A trial court errs by disregarding an appellate court's mandate and refusing to enter a judgment as directed.
[2] Compliance by a lower court with an appellate court's mandate is a purely ministerial act.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“When an appellate court's mandate issues, compliance by the lower court with that mandate is a purely ministerial act. An appellate court has inherent power to see that its mandates are properly complied with by a lower court.”
Establishes the mandatory nature of appellate mandates and the appellate court's inherent authority to enforce compliance
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFlorida Peninsula issued a homeowner's insurance policy to Maricela Cespedes. The trial court initially granted partial summary judgment in Cespedes's…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Enforce Mandate cases and more on FLexlaw
This case returns to us on a motion to enforce the mandate issued pursuant to our opinion in Florida Peninsula Insurance Co. v. Cespedes, 161 So.3d 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). When this case was first before us we reversed a partial summary judgment in favor of the appellee, Maricela Cespedes, which found her homeowner’s insurance policy covered sinkhole damage but left open the amount of damages. Because we concluded that the policy unambiguously excluded sinkhole damage, we held that it “was error for the trial court to deny Florida Peninsula’s motion for summary judgment,” and we directed the trial court to enter a judgment in favor of the appellant, Florida Peninsula. The trial court, however, did not do that. It disregarded our mandate and refused to enter a judgment in favor of Florida Peninsula. Apparently, the trial court believed that our direction to enter a judgment for Florida Peninsula did not mean a “final” judgment and that it was empowered to let the litigation continue. This was error.
Florida Peninsula’s motion was a motion for final summary judgment, a matter well understood by all parties below and throughout the appeal. Entry of a judgment in its favor concluded the litigation. “When an appellate court’s mandate issues, compliance by the lower court with that mandate is a purely ministerial act. An appellate court has inherent power to see that its mandates are properly complied with by a lower court.” Straley v. Frank, 650 So.2d 628, 628 (Fla. 2d DCA *1161994) (citations omitted). The motion to enforce mandate is granted and this case is remanded, again, for entry of final judgment in favor of Florida Peninsula.
Florida Peninsula’s motion for attorney’s fees is granted in an amount to be determined by the trial court.
VILLANTI, C.J., and MORRIS,1 J, Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Straley v. Frank, 650 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Fla. Peninsula Ins. Co. v. Maricela Cespedes, 161 So. 3d 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)