N.G., MOTHER OF G.R. AND J.M., CHILDREN, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2016-09-29
No. 5D16-1968
Evander, J., Lambert, J., Edwards, J.
200 So. 3d 237 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2016) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court reversed and remanded a parental rights termination judgment because the written order failed to include required findings of fact, despite the trial court's detailed oral pronouncement.


Holding

A final judgment terminating parental rights must contain written findings of fact as required by statute, not merely oral pronouncements or conclusions of law.


Headnotes

[1] A final judgment terminating parental rights must contain written findings of fact as required by statute, even when the trial court has made detailed oral findings and c…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“If the court terminates parental rights, the court shall enter a written order of disposition briefly stating the facts upon which its decision to terminate the parental rights is made.”

Statutory requirement under § 39.811(5), Fla. Stat. (2016)

Facts & Procedural History

N.G. appealed a trial court's final judgment terminating her parental rights to children G.R. and J.M. The trial court made detailed oral findings but…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

N.G. (“Appellant”) appeals the trial court’s entry of a final judgment terminating the parental rights to her children, G.R. and J.M. Appellant argues, and the Florida Department of Children and Families (“Appellee”) concedes, that the final judgment terminating Appellant’s parental rights does not contain the findings of fact required by law. See § 89.811(5), Fla. Stat. (2016) (“If the court terminates parental rights, the court shall enter a written order of disposition briefly stating the facts upon which its decision to terminate the parental rights is made.”).

This Court has carefully reviewed the record on appeal and noted that the trial transcript includes a detailed and thoughtful oral pronouncement by the trial court, which sets forth findings of fact, evaluations of witness credibility, as well as explanations of the court’s findings and conclusions of law. Section 39.811(5), however, requires the written order to state the facts upon which the trial court’s ruling is based. The final judgment entered in this case contains conclusions of law that are supported by the trial court’s oral statement of facts; however, the judgment does not adequately set forth the findings of fact. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to enter an amended final judgment within twenty days of the date of this opinion that includes its findings of fact along with its previously stated conclusions of law and rulings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

EVANDER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw