BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
JEFFREY S. BALOUN, ET AL., APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substantial Compliance Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
The Bank of New York Mellon appeals from the order dismissing its foreclosure action against Jeffrey S. Baloun and Sara Ross Hardy-Baloun on the grounds that the default letter did not comply with the notice requirement set forth in paragraphs 20 and 22 of the mortgage. Because Bank’s letter substantially complied with its notice obligations under the mortgage, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Johnson, 185 So.3d 594, 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Diaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 189 So.3d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So.3d 7, 14-15 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Bank of America v. Cadet, 183 So.3d 477, 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Suntrust Mortg., Inc. v. Garcia, 186 So.3d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
BERGER, WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So. 3d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
- The Bank OF NEW York Mellon v. Johnson, 185 So. 3d 594 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
- Jairo Diaz and Delsy Diaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 189 So. 3d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
- Bank OF Am. v. Francois Claude Cadet, 183 So. 3d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)