MOSES ROSENTHAL, APPELLANT,
v.
A. A. JACKSON, AS RECEIVER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1959-04-30
No. 58-680
CARROLL, CHAS., ' C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
111 So. 2d 480 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Scott v. SUN Bank OF Volusia Cnty., 408 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
    …ed with prejudice on the ground that consideration was lacking. Appellant contends that SP&W’s agreement to release the bank from its obligation of re-assigning the note and mortgage to SP&W was sufficient to bind the bank. In Greenfield v. Millman, 111 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), the court quoted the applicable rule from Restatement (First), Contracts § 84: Consideration is not insufficient because of the fact * * * * * * (c) That the party giving the consideration is then bound by a duty owed to the p…
  • Int'l Ins. Co. v. Johns, 874 F.2d 1447 (11th Cir. 1989)
    …volatile time, the golden parachute helps reduce monitoring costs during the takeover threat. See infra p. 1466. Performance that differs from what was previously due is sufficient consideration to support a separate promise. Greenfield v. Millman, 111 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). .Corporations desire to minimize monitoring costs, which are termed "agency costs” in neoclassical economics. See Jensen & Meckling, Theory of the Firm, 3 J.Fin.Econ. 305, 308 (1976). . These costs, from a neoclassical economic…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw