RALF J. PANITZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2016-08-17
No. 2D16-836
CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
198 So. 3d 1050 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2016)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Moore v. State, 882 So.2d 977 (Fla.2004); Panitz v. State, 130 So.3d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Guilford v. State, 88 So.3d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Hughes v. State, 22 So.Sd 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Carpenter v. State, 884 So.2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Burttram v. State, 846 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Harris v. State, 111 So.2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Dorsett *1051 v. State, 166 So.3d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); Fernandez v. State, 910 So.2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Williams v. State, 907 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); At-water v. State, 781 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Thomas v. State, 778 So.2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (13 total)

View all 13 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw