MEAGAN TRAMBLE, APPELLANT,
v.
RODNEY TRAMBLE, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2016-06-24
No. 5D14-3751
PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
193 So. 3d 1105 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred by failing to address retroactive child support, but affirmed other aspects of the judgment.


Facts & Procedural History

The Former Wife appealed a final judgment dissolving her marriage. No transcript was provided, limiting review to errors on the face of the judgment o…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
COHEN, J.

COHEN, J.

Meagan Tramble (“Former Wife”) appeals a final judgment dissolving her marriage to Rodney Tramble (“Former Husband”). No transcript of the trial was provided, nor was a statement of the evidence or proceedings settled and approved pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4).1 Even in the absence of a transcript, we review these cases closely. Our review is limited, though, to error appearing on the face of the final judgment or in the pleadings and other matters in the record. Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Most of Former Wife’s arguments either cannot be substantiated without a transcript or are, in fact, refuted by the limited record provided.2 Yet we do find reversal is required on one issue of substance — the trial court’s failure to address Former Wife’s request for child support retroactive to the date of separation. We remand for the trial court to determine Former Husband’s liability, if any, for retroactive child support. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED for further proceedings.

PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gold Rock, Inc. v. The Bank OF NEW York Mellon, 210 So. 3d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Whitburn, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 193 So. 3d 1105 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (on motion for rehearing). KELLY, WALLACE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.…
  • Harris v. Harris (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Tramble v. Tramble, 193 So. 3d 1105, 1105 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (holding that in absence of transcript or statement of evidence, appellate court’s review is limited to errors appearing on face of final judgment or in pleadings and other matters in record); Spreng v. Spreng, 162 So. 3d 1…
  • Harris v. Harris, 241 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw