MARIANNA LIME PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
v.
STATE, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF G. D. HILTON
MARIANNA LIME PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
STATE, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF G. D. HILTON
113 Fla. 258
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 151 So. 379
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
This Cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Cotirt that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same .is hereby affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kiplinger v. Kiplinger, 147 Fla. 243 (Fla. 1941)…is established, the Court has power to require the husband to provide temporary alimony and suit money for his wife. See Wood v. Wood, 56 Fla. 882, 47 So. 560; Tippin v. Tippin, 60 Fla. 378, 53 So. 838.” The case of Howell v. Howell, 113 Fla. 129, 151 So. 379, was a suit under the provisions of Section 4989 C. G. L., and the bill of complaint alleged that the defendant at the time of filing the bill of complaint was within the jurisdiction of the court. The record in the case at bar shows that the partie…