ANDRE BURGESS, PETITIONER,
v.
JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2016-04-28
No. 1D16-1531
SWANSON, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
190 So. 3d 224 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

SWANSON, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Klemish v. Alex Villacastin, M.D., 216 So. 3d 14 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
    …t of procedural rules and burdens and standards, a job that the trial court is not tasked to do.”). See also Estate of Yetta Novosett v. Arc Vill. II, LLC, 189 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Estate of Reinshagen ex rel. Reinshagen v. WRYP ALF, LLC, 190 So. 3d 224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s arbitration order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. As we did in Crespo and A.K., we certify conflict with the decision of the Second District Court of Ap…
  • Gaeta v. Seaside Manor, LLC, 238 So. 3d 448 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
    …policy, and that those provisions cannot be severed, citing Gessa v. Manor Care of Florida, Inc. , 86 So. 3d 484 (Fla. 2011), Shotts v. OP Winter Haven, Inc. , 86 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 2011), and Estate of Reinshagen ex rel. Reinshagen v. WRYP ALF, LLC , 190 So. 3d 224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). We agree.1 In light of this binding case law, Appellees make no attempt to argue that any of the challenged provisions are consistent with public policy or even that they are severable. Rather, Appellees' primary argument is t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw