TRAVIS J. BUSH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2016-03-24
No. 5D14-4525
TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
188 So. 3d 909 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2016) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Travis Bush appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court after it found that he had violated his probation. Although thére was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s decision, we are compelled to remand because, as the State properly concedes, the trial court failed to enter a written order specifying the probation conditions violated. See Bell v. State, 60 So.3d 558, 558 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Young v. State, 4 So.3d 1265, 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence but remand for. .entry of a proper revocation order specifying which conditions Bush was found to have violated.

AFFIRMED; case REMANDED for entry of a proper adjudication order.

TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …trial court apparently agreed and refused to release the original note to Kajaine. We reverse. The issue of whether Kondaur could establish standing to foreclose is distinct from whether it owned the note. See, e.g., DeDries v. CitiMortgage Inc., 188 So. 3d 909, 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). Kondaur had a valid assignment but could -not, establish that U.S. Bank’s ownership predated tjhe filing of the foreclosure action. See id. (noting that standing must be shown as of the date complaint was filed). That does…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw