CARL J. SIERP, APPELLANT,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the foreclosure judgment but remanded for correction of the judgment to reflect the proper plaintiff.
A homeowner appealed a final judgment of foreclosure. During the trial, the court substituted Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) for JPMorga…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Admissibility Of Business Records cases and more on FLexlaw
A homeowner appeals a final judgment of foreclosure raising several issues, including the admissibility of business records, compliance with a condition precedent, and various other evidentiary decisions by the trial court. We find no merit in any of the issues raised and affirm the final judgment.
At trial, the court granted an ore tenus motion to substitute Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) as the plaintiff. However, the final judgment entered by the court is in favor of the original named plaintiff Chase, and the appeal documents state Chase as the ap-pellee, not FNMA.
As a substituted plaintiff, FNMA stands in the shoes of the original named plaintiff. Miller v. Kondaur Capital Corp., 91 So.3d 218, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Therefore, we remand the case to the trial court to *581enter final judgment for the proper plaintiff, Federal National Mortgage Association.
Affirmed, but Remanded for Correction of Judgment.
GROSS, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.