LAMBERT F. AGAMA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Scoresheet cases and more on FLexlaw
Lambert F. Agama appeals his judgments and sentences for traveling to seduce, solicit, or entice a child to commit a sex act in violation of section 847.0135(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), and using a computer to seduce, solicit, or entice a child to commit a sex act in violation of section 847.0135(3)(a). Mr. Agama correctly argues that a conviction and sentence for both offenses violates the prohibition against double jeopardy. See Meythaler v. State, 175 So.3d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); see also State v. Shelley, 176 So.3d 914 (Fla.2015). Accordingly, we reverse the conviction and sentence for soliciting. Although we affirm Mr. Agama’s conviction for traveling, the reversal of the conviction for soliciting substantially reduces the total points on the sentencing scoresheet. We thus remand for the trial court to vacate Mr. Agama’s sentence for traveling and to resentence Mr. Agama on that conviction.
*572Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stapler v. State, 190 So. 3d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
-
Honaker v. State, 199 So. 3d 1068 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
-
Straitiff v. State, 228 So. 3d 1173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2015)
- Stuard Antonio Meythaler v. State, 175 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)