GREEN-MAR BUILDERS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JULES PEARLMAN, D/B/A JULES REALTY CO. (NOT INCORPORATED), APPELLEE
GREEN-MAR BUILDERS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
JULES PEARLMAN, D/B/A JULES REALTY CO. (NOT INCORPORATED), APPELLEE
109 So. 2d 601
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully reviewed appellant’s assignments of error and the questions raised thereunder, together with the briefs and record in this cause. The burden is upon the appellant to clearly demonstrate wherein the trial court has erred and failing this, the judgment appealed should be and it is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stone v. Stone, 873 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…d which would establish that the trial court erred when it apparently summarily denied the “motion-complaint.” The burden of proof on appeal lies with the appellant to demonstrate that the trial court erred. See Green-Mar Builders, Inc. v. Pearlman, 109 So. 2d 601, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). We must affirm because no reversible error has been shown in case number 00-4215 with respect to the trial court’s order denying Mr. Stone’s “complaint-motion.” Affirmed as to that portion of the order which deals with case…
-
Fla. Builders, Inc. v. Fla. Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. AT W. Palm Beach, 161 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…n v. Arnold Altex Aluminum Co., Fla.App.1961, 134 So. 2d 268. The appellant has failed to demonstrate any error in the proceedings in the trial court. Mellet v. Henry, Fla.App. 1959, 108 So. 2d 69; Green-Mar Builders, Inc. v. Pearlman, Fla.App.1959, 109 So. 2d 601; Brown v. Householder, Fla.App. 1961, 134 So. 2d 801. To the contrary, the record on appeal reveals that the trial judge correctly applied the principles of law, enunciated in Willcox v. Stephenson, 30 Fla. 377, 11 So. 659; Lalow v. Codomo, Fla.1958…
-
Cleeland v. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., 159 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…deposition of the Plaintiff, and the admissible portions of the affidavits before the Court * * * [emphasis added] Upon this appeal, it was incumbent upon the appellant to demonstrate error. See: Green-Mar Builders, Inc. v. Pearlman, Fla.App.1959, 109 So. 2d 601; DiVosta v. Boam Corp., Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 42. The appellant failed to accompany the record with the deposition of the plaintiff which, in part, contributed to the trial judge’s ruling. Therefore, this court does not have before it the entire…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence