GRANADA FELIPE, APPELLANT,
v.
RANDOLHF RINCON, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2015-08-21
No. 5D15-101
ORFINGER, WALLIS, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
172 So. 3d 565 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a default final judgment was improperly entered because the father failed to provide proper notice and service of process to the mother.


Facts & Procedural History

The mother initially filed a petition for paternity and time-sharing. The father later filed a counter-petition and motion for default, both lacking c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Granada Felipe (“Mother”) appeals the default final judgment of paternity, time-sharing, and child support entered in favor of Randolhf Rincon (“Father”). Mother, who initially submitted a petition to establish paternity and timesharing, participated in the litigation over the course of one year before Father filed a counter-petition requesting to establish paternity and time-sharing. Father’s counter-petition did -not include a certificate of service. Twenty-five days after filing his counter-petition, *566Father moved for judicial default, again failing to include a certifícate of service.1 The trial court entered the default, with its own certificate of service noting the wrong address for Mother despite Mother filing an updated address fewer than three weeks prior. Mother, representing herself pro se, filed a motion contesting service and notice. Despite Mother’s motion and her presence at the hearing, the trial court entered a default final judgment. The record does ,not reflect that Mother received service of the counter-petition, the motion for default, the order granting default, or notice of the final hearing under Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.080(c)(2), which requires notice to defaulted parties of final hearings.2 We therefore reverse the default final judgment and remand for the trial court to vacate the judicial default.

REVERSED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

ORFINGER, WALLIS, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw