THOMAS K. EVANS, APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIS CARROLL, APPELLEE
THOMAS K. EVANS, APPELLANT,
LOUIS CARROLL, APPELLEE
108 So. 2d 782
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The facts in this case are set out in Evans v. Carroll, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 375, wherein the Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional questions raised by appellant are mere abstract issues and do not require disposition.
The remaining questions are without merit and will stand affirmed.
Affirmed.
KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maloney v. Kirk, 212 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1968)…Constitution, F.S.A. The statute under consideration was obviously enacted for the purpose of carrying out this constitutional duty." (e. s.) Ervin v. Capital Weekly Post, Fla. 1957, 97 So. 2d 464, 469. . Evans v. Carroll, Fla.1958, 104 So. 2d 37, 108 So. 2d 782. . Buckingham v. State (1944), 3 Terry 405, 42 Del. 405, 35 A. 2d 903; Mississippi County v. Green (1940), 200 Ark. 204, 138 S.W. 2d 377; People ex rel. Hoyne v. McCormick (1913), 261 Ill. 413, 103 N.E. 1053, Ann.Cas.1915A, 338; Campbell v. Hunt (1…
Authorities Cited
- Evans v. Carroll, 104 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1958)