ALFONSO ALZAMORA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2014-12-19
No. 5D14-1888
SAWAYA, PALMER, and BERGER, JJ., concur.
152 So. 3d 865 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Alfonso Alzamora appeals the order denying the motion he filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because the trial court failed to address the claim regarding jail credit, we reverse that part of the order and remand this case so the trial court may properly consider that claim. We note that the State concedes this error. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER, and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Allen v. State, 176 So. 3d 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
    …gard to his non-homicide armed robbery, conviction, the trial court failed to address this claim. See 560 U.S. at 74-75, 130 S.Ct. 2011 . Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for it to consider the Graham claim on the merits. Alzamora v. State, 152 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (finding that because the trial court failed to address a claim, [*1015] remand was necessary so that it could properly consider that claim). REVERSED and REMANDED. LAWSON, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw