JOHN PAUL, APPELLANT,

v.

HOSPITAL HOUSEKEEPING SYSTEMS, LTD AND HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Baptiste v. State, 179 So. 3d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …review the, trial court’s determination of constitutional rights de novo.” Spivey v. State, 45 So. 3d 51, 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citations -omitted). A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress is reviewed for harmless error. See Scott v. State, 151 So. 3d 567, 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). [*506] Appellant argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to- suppress statements he made to police because his statements were made after officers misrepresented the law by promising that he could not be charged…
• Mears v. State, 183 So. 3d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
  …y to consult with his counsel on a break from his testimony. The State responds that the defendant does not have a constitutional right to confer with his counsel during cross-examination. We have de novo review of this legal issue. Scott v. State, 151 So. 3d 567, 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Delimit v. State, 95 So. 3d 134, 150 (Fla.2012)). The issue arose at the end of a State-requested sidebar, outside the presence of the jury. The trial court had just found that the defendant’s comment about being be…
• Washington v. State, 253 So. 3d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)