CORI G. CAMERON, APPELLANT,
v.
CHRISTOPHER N. CAMERON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in its child support calculations by including employer contributions to health insurance in gross income without subtracting a corresponding amount for net income. The court also held that the final judgment incorrectly allocated daycare expenses contrary to the oral pronouncement.
Wife appealed a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, arguing the trial court miscalculated child support and allocated daycare expenses improper…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Net Income cases and more on FLexlaw
Cori Cameron (“Wife”) appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. She contends that the trial court erred in its child support calculations by including in Wife’s gross income amounts that the employer contributed to her health insurance costs without subtracting a corre*987sponding amount in determining her net income. Christopher Cameron (“Husband”) concedes error.
Wife also argues that the final judgment did not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement regarding the responsibility for daycare expenses incurred after the child began voluntary prekindergarten in August 2013. The trial court orally pronounced that these expenses would be shared in the same percentage(s) utilized for the purpose of calculating child support.1 However, the final judgment imposed the obligation to pay these expenses entirely upon Wife. Husband again concedes error.2
On remand, after redetermining Wife’s net income, the trial court is directed to recalculate child support, child support ar-rearages, and each party’s respective share for child care expenses.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
EVANDER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.