ADAM BENJAMIN HUNT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2014-08-13
No. 4D14-2075
MAY, FORST and KLINGENMITH, JJ., concur.
145 So. 3d 900 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2014)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Adam Benjamin Hunt’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) because he has not demonstrated entitlement to relief under that rule. His challenges suggest possible claims of ineffective assistance of defense counsel and involuntary plea. Our affirmance is without prejudice to his right to file a motion for post-conviction relief in compliance with the verification and content requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, within thirty days of the date of this court’s mandate. A rule 3.850 motion filed within that deadline will be considered timely filed. Orosco v. State, 801 So.2d 303 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST and KLINGENMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw