WALTER VEGA, APPELLANT,
v.
FRS ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATORS, AND ACCORD HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK ENTERPRISED MANAGEMENT, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-07-28
No. 1D13-5947
Van Nortwick, J., Clark, J., Swanson, J.
145 So. 3d 895 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Claimant's workers' compensation benefits were properly denied under Florida Statute § 440.09(4) because he was convicted of workers' compensation fraud under § 440.105, resulting in forfeiture of all benefits.


Holding

A claimant convicted of workers' compensation fraud under section 440.105, Florida Statutes, is disqualified from all workers' compensation benefits under section 440.09(4).


Headnotes

[1] A claimant convicted of workers' compensation fraud under section 440.105, Florida Statutes, forfeits entitlement to all workers' compensation benefits under section 440.…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Claimant was convicted and adjudicated guilty of workers' compensation fraud in a court of competent jurisdiction.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant challenges an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) that concludes Claimant is disqualified, under section 440.09(4), Florida Statutes (1998), from all benefits otherwise available to him under the Florida Workers’ Compensation Law. Upon receipt of Claimant’s brief, this court entered an order advising the parties that this appeal is being considered for summary affirmance under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). Accordingly, the parties were directed to refrain from further briefing.

Because the record evidence supports the JCC’s finding that Claimant was convicted and adjudicated guilty of workers’ compensation fraud under section 440.105, *896Florida Statutes, in a court of competent jurisdiction, we find no error in the JCC’s conclusion that Claimant has, therefore, forfeited his entitlement to workers’ compensation benefits as directed by section 440.09(4). Accordingly, we affirm the appealed order, which denies all benefits on this basis. We further conclude that Claimant fails to present a preliminary basis for this court to reverse the order on appeal; thus, under rule 9.315(a) we AFFIRM the order on appeal, on a summary basis.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw