EDGARD CARRION NAVEDO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDGARD CARRION NAVEDO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
140 So. 3d 1106
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2014)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). See also Smith v. State, 81 So.3d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
PALMER, ORFINGER, and LAWSON, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jabe Ira Carney v. State, 158 So. 3d 706 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…and dressed in nonjail attire. We agree with the postconviction court on both points. “[A]s a general rule, it is error for the trial court to compel a defense witness to appear in jail or prison clothing if the defendant objects.” Hayes v. State, 140 So. 3d 1106, 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); see also Mullins v. State, 766 So. 2d 1136, 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Some states have extended this general rule to all witnesses in criminal cases, whether for the prosecution or for the defense. See State v. Kuchera, 198…
Authorities Cited
- Carreras v. State, 81 So. 3d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
- Smith v. State, 81 So. 3d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)