L. MAXCY, INC., ET AL.,
v.
FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA
In this case motion for rehearing was' filed and granted. The motion was granted because it appeared that the case had been noted for oral argument and this notation was overlooked and the opinion was written without the cause having been orally argued before the Court. The case was set down for oral argument and on the day on. which it was to be argued the Court received advice from counsel that oral argument would not be presented.
The opinion and judgment of this Court heretofore rendered and filed on June 15, 1933 (111 Fla. 116, 150 So. 248), is now reaffirmed and adhered to.
So ordered.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tyson v. Lanier, 156 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1963)…11(3), F. S.A., are so clear that they hardly admit of interpretation. State ex rel. Florida Jai Alai, Inc., v. State Racing Commission, Fla. 1959, 112 So. 2d 825. In L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 111 Fla. 116, 150 So. 248 (1933), 112 Fla. 835, 151 So. 276, though different in many respects from the case at bar, there are similar aspects to the two cases and there are pronouncements in the latter case that could be said to be persuasive here. When the concept “just valuation,” “full cash…
-
Lanier v. Tyson, 147 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…. The maxim of construction, expressio unius est exclusio al-terius, applies in this context. The 'Constitution, having specified permissible exemptions, has excluded others. L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, supra, opinion adhered to 112 Fla. 835,- 151 So. 276; State ex rel. Burbridge v. St. John, 1940, 143 Fla. 544, 197 So. 131, 143 Fla. 876, 197 So. 549. Our decision in this case, however, does not rest on constitutionality, both parties having repeatedly asserted that the constitutionali…1 / 2
-
Franks v. Davis, 145 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 1962)…31; 76 N.H. 609, 85 A. 757; Stillman v. Lynch, 56 Utah 540, 192 P. 272, 12 A.L.R. 552. . State ex rel. Burbridge v. St. John, 143 Fla. 544, 197 So. 131, 134; 143 Fla. 876, 197 So. 549; L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Federal Land Bank, 111 Fla. 116, 150 So. 248; 112 Fla. 835, 151 So. 276; Steuart v. State, 119 Fla. 117, 161 So. 378. Anno. 61 A.L.R.2d 1038, et seq. . State ex rel. Burbridge v. St. John, nota 10, supra, quoting earlier opinion.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Fed. Land Bank of Columbia, 111 Fla. 116 (Fla. 1933)