CARL L. HARVEY, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2014-04-02
No. 2D13-4806
CRENSHAW, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
138 So. 3d 1054 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Seagrave v. State, 802 So.2d 281 (Fla.2001); Knarich v. State, 866 So.2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Labadie v. State, 840 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

CRENSHAW, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …grounds upon which it is based and the substantial matters of law to be argued,’ ” and that , “[a] court errs when it enters summary judgment upon a ground not previously raised in the initial summary judgment motion.” Adams v. Bell Partners, Inc., 138 So. 3d 1054, 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Just as the rule requires that the grounds for the motion be specifically identified, the rule also requires that the evidence in support of and in opposition to the motion be specifically identified, pri- or to the hearin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw