LINDA PEDROZA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2014-03-12
No. 4D13-4581
STEVENSON, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
137 So. 3d 446 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Guzman v. State, 110 So.3d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

STEVENSON, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kruse v. State, 222 So. 3d 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
    …client would have enjoyed a different result.” Monroe v. State, 191 So. 3d 395, 403 (Fla. 2016). As such, “[ajn ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of law and fact and is therefore subject to de novo review.” Jones v. State, 137 So. 3d 446, 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (quoting Bowman v. State, 748 So. 2d 1082, 1083-84 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)). “[ineffective assistance of counsel claims should rarely be raised on direct appeal because they are generally fact-specific,” Michel v. State, 989 So…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw