NATALIE GREEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
We grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Review of the entire record on appeal and this brief demonstrates the absence of any issues of arguable merit which could be advanced in good conscience on appellant’s behalf. However, we note that the record on appeal does not include a written order revoking Green’s probation in the 2008 case and stating which conditions she violated. A written order is required. See Amador v. State, 80 So.3d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation and sentence in the 2008 prosecution in this case, but remand for entry of the required written order revoking probation. We affirm the adjudication and sentence in the 2012 case.
Affirmed and Remanded.
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lenz v. State, 183 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…objection was not so contemporaneous nor specific as it could have been, we find that it was sufficient to preserve the issue for review. Likewise, given all the circumstances, we cannot find that the error here was harmless. Cf. Ra mirez v. State, 132 So. 3d 849, 852-53 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). .The state further argues that Appellant did not properly preserve this issue for appellate review because he failed to request a pre-trial hearing to exclude portions of the jailhouse calls and further failed to object…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Iyamille Barbara Amador v. State, 80 So. 3d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)