MICHAEL PEREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL PEREZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
122 So. 3d 429
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
Upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion, we certify the following question to our supreme court as one of great public importance:
HOW SHOULD MANIFEST INJUSTICE BE DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF A CLAIM OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AFTER A GUILTY PLEA?
Certification granted.
SHEPHERD, C.J., and WELLS and LAGOA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Perez, 149 So. 3d 680 (Fla. 2014)…d upon the State’s motion, the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance: HOW SHOULD MANIFEST INJUSTICE BE DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF A CLAIM OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AFTER A GUILTY PLEA? Perez v. State, 122 So. 3d 429, 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Initially, the Court accepted review under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismis…