YVETTE ALEMAN, PETITIONER,
v.
U.S. BANK, N.A., ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. 3d DCA | 2013-09-04
No. 3D13-1258
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.
120 So. 3d 1254 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the concession of error in the only response to the petition for certio-rari, the petition is granted. The order of May 7, 2013, denying petitioner’s motion to stay pending payment of costs is quashed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Pozos, 242 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …diction to review a nonfinal order denying summary final judgment unless the trial court's order explicitly states that the defendant will not be entitled to present a worker's compensation immunity defense at trial"); Amcon Builders, Inc. v. Pardo, 120 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ; Coastal Bldg. Maint., Inc. v. Priegues, 22 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) ; Southern Pan Servs. Co. v. Rodriguez, 771 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) ; Peoplease Corp. v. Schroeder, 57 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) ; Footstar Corp…
  • Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Rafaela Sosa, 215 So. 3d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
    …rage or extent of liability are determined.” Furthermore, a review of the transcript of the hearing on the motion to dismiss also shows that the trial court did not reach or rule on the issue of sovereign immunity. Cf. Amcon Builders, Inc. v. Pardo, 120 So. 3d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (finding order denying summary judgment on a claim of workers’ compensation immunity not appealable “ ‘unless the trial court order specifically states that, as a matter of law, such a defense is not available to a party’ ”…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw