TODD M. GLOR, PETITIONER,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, RESPONDENT
TODD M. GLOR, PETITIONER,
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, RESPONDENT
120 So. 3d 69
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO ENFORCE THIS COURT’S MANDATE AND FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
DENIED. See Dodson v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 120 So.3d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (opinion on motion to enforce this court’s mandate). This case is remanded to the circuit court whereupon by either party’s filing of a proper motion requesting same, the circuit court shall remand to the Department for a new hearing that meets the essential requirements of the law. See Broward County v. G.B.V Int’l Ltd., 787 So.2d 838, 843-44 (Fla.2001); See also Clay County v. Kendale Land Dev., Inc., 969 So.2d 1177, 1180-81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
PADOVANO, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Nils Futch, 142 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…hway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 645 So. 2d 113, 114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (“When an evi-dentiary error is made in an administrative hearing, the remedy is to remand for further proceedings.”); see also Dodson v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 120 So. 3d 69, 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“We remand this case to the circuit court whereupon by either party’s filing of a proper motion, the case shall be remanded to the Department for a new hearing that meets the essential requirements of the law.”); Dep’t of Hi…
Authorities Cited
- Broward Cnty. v. G.B.V. Int'l, Ltd., 787 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2001)
- Clay Cnty. v. Kendale Land Dev., Inc., 969 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Dodson v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 120 So. 3d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)