TODD M. GLOR, PETITIONER,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, RESPONDENT
TODD M. GLOR, PETITIONER,
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, RESPONDENT
110 So. 3d 542
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the decision of the trial court is hereby quashed. See Dodson v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 111 So.3d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
PADOVANO, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Queior v. State, 157 So. 3d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…not competent evidence that the defendant violated his probation by selling them heroin when the officer “could not remember the name of the field test and stated that he did not know whether such a test [was] reliable”); see also Starling v. State, 110 So. 3d 542, 542-43 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (citing Carter and Weaver in support of its holding that the testimony of the defendant’s probation officer about a positive field test on the defendant’s urine sample was insufficient to sustain the revocation of probati…
Authorities Cited
- Dodson v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 111 So. 3d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)