RAYMOND LEE MABREY, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2013-04-03
No. 2D12-3941
CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
109 So. 3d 1264 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases


Opinion of the Court
VILLANTI, Judge.

VILLANTI, Judge.

Raymond Lee Mabrey appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Florida Parole Commission has waived briefing and concedes that Mabrey, who resides -within the territorial jurisdiction of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, properly sought his immediate release by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in that court. See Donovan v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 72 So.3d 339, 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Furthermore, the petition demonstrates on its face that Mabrey exhausted his administrative remedies once the Commission took final action on the revocation of his conditional release. The circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, should have reviewed the Commission’s order. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 703 So.2d 1202, 1206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (en banc), aff'd, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998).

Accordingly, we reverse the order dismissing Mabrey’s petition for writ of habe-as corpus and remand for the circuit court to consider the petition on its merits.

CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Duncan v. State, 192 So. 3d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
    …he extent that the court [*657] based the restitution award for the rifles on the prosecutor’s assertion that they were each worth $400 or $500, this was error as the “prosecutor’s assertions were not competent, substantial evidence.” D.C. v. State, 109 So. 3d 1264, 1266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). As to the gemstones, Duncan argues that the State failed to present competent, substantial evidence of the value of the gemstones because the victim’s estimate was based on hearsay — the catalog listing various gemstones a…
  • D.C. v. State, 125 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
    …PER CURIAM. The restitution order appealed in this case is the same order at issue in D.C. v. State, 109 So. 3d 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). For the reasons expressed in D.C., we reverse and remand for a new evidentiary hearing. Reversed and remanded. CASANUEVA, DAVIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.…
  • Lewis v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)
    …e paid a claim in the amount of $240,938. And our independent review of the record revealed no such testimony or evidence. The prosecutor's assertions regarding the amount of restitution were not competent substantial evidence. See D.C. v. State, 109 So. 3d 1264, 1266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (citing Molter v. State, 892 So. 2d 1115, 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)). Additionally, "[d]ue process requires a formal hearing on the amount of restitution." Barone v. State, 222 So. 3d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (citing L.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw